Theoretical computer science·OpenAI Math·Result 105·Lean formalisation listed
Perfect completeness for 2-to-1 games
One of the 372 results in OpenAI's public mathematics catalogue, filed under theoretical computer science: 1 preprint, the latest dated 23 September 2026. This page quotes OpenAI's own summary of the claim, links the paper and abstract, and embeds the animation.
In one line: OpenAI reports a result titled ‘Perfect completeness for 2-to-1 games’ (theoretical computer science) in a preprint dated 23 September 2026. It has not been peer reviewed. The channel's animation, Every OpenAI Math Result, Part 1 of 4: Goldfeld's Conjecture and 82 More, is on YouTube.
Chapter 69 of 83 in Every OpenAI Math Result, Part 1 of 4: Goldfeld's Conjecture and 82 More · starts at 23:36 · watch from there on YouTube →
What OpenAI claims
Proves Khot's 2-to-1 Games Conjecture with perfect completeness: for every fixed rational δ ∈ (0,1), it is NP-hard to distinguish satisfiable games from games whose optimum is at most δ, on explicit unweighted instances. The alphabet depends only on δ, and every right-hand label has exactly two preimages under each constraint map. (Lean)
Paper
Perfect completeness for 2-to-1 games
OpenAI's abstract We prove the 2-to-1 Games Conjecture with perfect completeness. For every fixed rational δ ∈ (0,1), it is NP-hard to distinguish satisfiable 2-to-1 games from games of value at most δ, with a fixed alphabet and an explicitly listed unweighted multiset of constraints.
Status
Preprint. The paper has not been independently reviewed. Treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it. If a video exists, it illustrates the statement; it is not the proof.
Quick answers
- Is it proven?
- Not independently yet. OpenAI posted a preprint on 23 September 2026; it has not been peer reviewed, so treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it.
- What exactly does OpenAI claim?
- Proves Khot's 2-to-1 Games Conjecture with perfect completeness: for every fixed rational δ ∈ (0,1), it is NP-hard to distinguish satisfiable games from games whose optimum is at most δ, on explicit unweighted instances. The alphabet depends only on δ, and every right-hand label has exactly two preimages under each constraint map. (Lean)
- Where is the proof?
- In the paper, Perfect completeness for 2-to-1 games (PDF).
- Is there a video?
- Yes, on YouTube (28:48, chapter 69).
Also in
- Chapter 2 of 10 in Unique Games Conjecture, Bin Packing and 8 More in Theoretical Computer Science · starts at 0:21 · watch from there on YouTube →
The video
Every OpenAI Math Result, Part 1 of 4: Goldfeld's Conjecture and 82 More · Compilation · 28:48 · chapter 69 from 23:36 · description, sources and chapters →
Related results in Theoretical computer science
- 106Hardness of coloring three-colorable graphsVideoLean
- 107Matrix multiplication with exponent at most 9/4VideoLean
- 108A cubic permanent–determinant lower boundVideoLean
- 109Integer multiplication below n log nVideo
- 110Optimal-order randomized k-server on arbitrary metricsVideoLean
- 111One-sample matroid prophet inequalities against an almighty adversaryVideoLean