Theoretical computer science·OpenAI Math·Result 105·Lean formalisation listed

Perfect completeness for 2-to-1 games

One of the 372 results in OpenAI's public mathematics catalogue, filed under theoretical computer science: 1 preprint, the latest dated 23 September 2026. This page quotes OpenAI's own summary of the claim, links the paper and abstract, and embeds the animation.

In one line: OpenAI reports a result titled ‘Perfect completeness for 2-to-1 games’ (theoretical computer science) in a preprint dated 23 September 2026. It has not been peer reviewed. The channel's animation, Every OpenAI Math Result, Part 1 of 4: Goldfeld's Conjecture and 82 More, is on YouTube.

Compilation · 28:48 · 14 October 2026 · from 23:36Watch on YouTube →

Subscribe on YouTube

Chapter 69 of 83 in Every OpenAI Math Result, Part 1 of 4: Goldfeld's Conjecture and 82 More · starts at 23:36 · watch from there on YouTube →

What OpenAI claims

Proves Khot's 2-to-1 Games Conjecture with perfect completeness: for every fixed rational δ ∈ (0,1), it is NP-hard to distinguish satisfiable games from games whose optimum is at most δ, on explicit unweighted instances. The alphabet depends only on δ, and every right-hand label has exactly two preimages under each constraint map. (Lean)

Paper

  1. Perfect completeness for 2-to-1 games

    · Preprint, not peer reviewed · PDF

    OpenAI's abstract We prove the 2-to-1 Games Conjecture with perfect completeness. For every fixed rational δ ∈ (0,1), it is NP-hard to distinguish satisfiable 2-to-1 games from games of value at most δ, with a fixed alphabet and an explicitly listed unweighted multiset of constraints.

Status

Preprint. The paper has not been independently reviewed. Treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it. If a video exists, it illustrates the statement; it is not the proof.

Quick answers

Is it proven?
Not independently yet. OpenAI posted a preprint on 23 September 2026; it has not been peer reviewed, so treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it.
What exactly does OpenAI claim?
Proves Khot's 2-to-1 Games Conjecture with perfect completeness: for every fixed rational δ ∈ (0,1), it is NP-hard to distinguish satisfiable games from games whose optimum is at most δ, on explicit unweighted instances. The alphabet depends only on δ, and every right-hand label has exactly two preimages under each constraint map. (Lean)
Where is the proof?
In the paper, Perfect completeness for 2-to-1 games (PDF).
Is there a video?
Yes, on YouTube (28:48, chapter 69).

Also in

The video

Every OpenAI Math Result, Part 1 of 4: Goldfeld's Conjecture and 82 More · Compilation · 28:48 · chapter 69 from 23:36 · description, sources and chapters →

Related results in Theoretical computer science

All 40 results in Theoretical computer science →