Combinatorics·OpenAI Math·Result 186·Lean formalisation listed
Uniform influence and sharp thresholds for graph and hypergraph properties
One of the 372 results in OpenAI's public mathematics catalogue, filed under combinatorics: 2 preprints, the latest dated 5 October 2026. This page quotes OpenAI's own summary of the claim, links the papers and abstracts, and will embed the animation.
Latest paper
A uniform influence bound for hypergraph properties
The animation for this result has not been released yet. Subscribe on YouTube to catch it.
What OpenAI claims
Proves the Friedgut–Kalai threshold-width conjectures for graphs and fixed-uniformity hypergraphs. For fixed 0 < ε < 1/2, every nontrivial increasing relabeling-invariant property crosses from probability ε to 1-ε within width O((log n)-2) for graphs and Or((log n)-r/(r-1)) for r-uniform hypergraphs, r ≥ 3. The hypergraph influence bound also applies to nonmonotone properties. (Lean)
Papers (2)
A uniform influence bound for hypergraph properties
For every fixed integer r ≥ 3, we prove that every relabeling-invariant Boolean property of simple r-uniform hypergraphs on n vertices satisfies Var p(f) ≤ Cr Ip(f)/(log n)r/(r-1). The constant depends only on r, and the bound holds uniformly for all 0 < p < 1 without a monotonicity assumption. For increasing properties, it gives the corresponding threshold-width bound with exponent r/(r-1), proving the hypergraph threshold-width conjecture of Friedgut and Kalai.
A Sharp Threshold Bound for Monotone Graph Properties
We prove the Friedgut–Kalai sharp-threshold conjecture. For every integer n ≥ 2, every nontrivial increasing family of graphs on n vertices invariant under all vertex permutations, and every 0 < ε < 1/2, the edge probabilities at which its probability equals ε and 1-ε differ by at most C log(1/(2ε))/(log n)2, for a universal constant C.
Status
Preprint. The papers have not been independently reviewed. Treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it. If a video exists, it illustrates the statement; it is not the proof.
Related results in Combinatorics
- 187Snaky in 21 Maker movesLean
- 188The sharp terminal leave in random triangle removalLean
- 189Cycle–clique Ramsey numbersLean
- 190Polynomial removal fails for ordered binary matricesLean
- 191A power improvement in the Heilbronn triangle lower boundLean
- 192Boolean functions violate the square-root degree bound by arbitrary factorsLean