Separating choiceless counting from polynomial time and witnessed choice

What OpenAI claims

Confirms the Blass–Gurevich–Shelah noncapture conjecture: consistency of a linear system over 𝔽3 defines a polynomial-time query on unordered finite structures that choiceless polynomial time with counting cannot express. A separate result shows that adding witnessed symmetric choice strictly increases expressive power. Both separations hold for the full counting formalism, allowing hereditarily finite sets of arbitrary finite rank. (Lean)

Papers (2)

1. Choiceless polynomial time with counting does not capture polynomial time

   23 September 2026 · Preprint, not peer reviewed · PDF

   We prove that choiceless polynomial time with counting does not capture polynomial time on unordered finite structures, confirming the noncapture conjecture of Blass, Gurevich and Shelah. A linear-consistency query over 𝔽3 in a fixed binary vocabulary is decidable in polynomial time but not in the full counting formalism.

2. Witnessed symmetric choice is strictly stronger than choiceless polynomial time with counting

   24 September 2026 · Preprint, not peer reviewed · PDF

   We prove that witnessed symmetric choice strictly increases the expressive power of choiceless polynomial time with counting. A fixed sentence with one witnessed-choice occurrence defines a Boolean query on every finite input that is not definable in the original counting formalism.

Status

Preprint. The papers have not been independently reviewed. Treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it. If a video exists, it illustrates the statement; it is not the proof.