Convex and metric geometry·OpenAI Math·Result 095·Lean formalisation listed
Hyperbolicity cones without semidefinite lifts
One of the 372 results in OpenAI's public mathematics catalogue, filed under convex and metric geometry: 3 preprints, the latest dated 5 October 2026. This page quotes OpenAI's own summary of the claim, links the papers and abstracts, and will embed the animation.
Latest paper
Hyperbolicity Cones Without Semidefinite Lifts
The animation for this result has not been released yet. Subscribe on YouTube to catch it.
What OpenAI claims
Disproves the Projected Lax conjecture: some hyperbolicity cones are not spectrahedral shadows. The examples admit no exact finite affine semidefinite lift, regardless of the number of auxiliary variables or the real coefficients used. This also disproves the generalized Lax conjecture that every hyperbolicity cone is spectrahedral. (Lean)
Papers (3)
Hyperbolicity Cones Without Semidefinite Lifts
We prove that not every hyperbolicity cone is a spectrahedral shadow: some closed hyperbolicity cones admit no finite affine semidefinite lift, even with arbitrary real coefficients and any finite number of auxiliary variables. This disproves the Projected Lax Conjecture and hence the generalized Lax conjecture.
A nonspectrahedral hyperbolicity cone
We construct a homogeneous polynomial of degree 16 in 23 real variables whose hyperbolicity cone has no representation by a finite homogeneous real symmetric linear matrix inequality. This disproves the geometric Generalized Lax conjecture.
An Exact Semidefinite Lift of a Nonspectrahedral Hyperbolicity Cone
We construct an exact semidefinite lift of the explicit nonspectrahedral hyperbolicity cone in twenty-three variables defined in the companion paper. The lift is a homogeneous real symmetric pencil of size 100 with 307 auxiliary variables and represents the entire closed cone, including every point with singular X. Thus, although this cone has no semidefinite representation in its original coordinates, it admits one when auxiliary variables are allowed. The stated sizes are not claimed to be minimal.
Status
Preprint. The papers have not been independently reviewed. Treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it. If a video exists, it illustrates the statement; it is not the proof.
Related results in Convex and metric geometry
- 096The Gaussian propeller conjecture in every dimensionLean
- 097The Euclidean Steinitz–Bergström boundLean
- 098Compact counterexamples to bi-Lipschitz dimension reductionLean
- 099The sharp exponential scale of edit-distance distortionLean
- 100Cylinder coverings below the half-area boundLean
- 101The sharp simplex conjecture for isotropic constants