Theoretical computer science·OpenAI Math·Result 134·Lean formalisation listed
Generalized star height at most three
One of the 372 results in OpenAI's public mathematics catalogue, filed under theoretical computer science: 3 preprints, the latest dated 25 September 2026. This page quotes OpenAI's own summary of the claim, links the papers and abstracts, and will embed the animation.
Latest paper
Finite Monoid Computations and a Uniform Generalized Star-Height Bound
The animation for this result has not been released yet. Subscribe on YouTube to catch it.
What OpenAI claims
Every regular language over a finite alphabet has a generalized regular expression with at most three nested Kleene stars, allowing union, concatenation and complement over the same alphabet. This establishes an absolute bound independent of automaton size, resolving the uniform-boundedness version of the generalized star-height problem. (Lean)
Papers (3)
Finite Monoid Computations and a Uniform Generalized Star-Height Bound
Every regular language over a finite alphabet has a generalized regular expression of star height at most thirteen over that same alphabet. We prove this uniform bound by representing finite monoid computations as affine updates and recovering them through twelve successive split constructions.
Generalized Star Height at Most Four
Every regular language over a finite alphabet has generalized star height at most four over that same alphabet. We give a complete construction using an affine correction that hides one interval product, a finite clock, and several scales for moving boundaries through periodic words.
Generalized Star Height at Most Three
Every regular language over a finite alphabet has generalized star height at most three, with complement taken in the same free monoid. We express finite-monoid computations using a prefix code of word pieces.
Status
Preprint. The papers have not been independently reviewed. Treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it. If a video exists, it illustrates the statement; it is not the proof.
Related results in Theoretical computer science
- 135Homogeneous depth-five lower bounds for iterated matrix multiplicationLean
- 136A quasilinear PCP theorem for PPAD
- 137One-tape time simulation in two-fifths-power spaceLean
- 138Subset Sum in O(20.49n) time
- 139Subpolynomial query complexity for log-concave samplingLean
- 140Memory–sample lower bounds for noiseless Gaussian regressionLean